Driving Under the Influence (DUI) is a serious offense in California, particularly in San Francisco, where law enforcement is vigilant about identifying impaired drivers. Significant consequences, including as fines, license suspension, required DUI education courses, and even jail time, can result from a DUI conviction. However, a skilled San Francisco DUI attorney may be able to identify common legal defenses to help mitigate or even dismiss the charges against you. The most common defenses a San Francisco DUI attorney might use in your case.
Improper Stop of the Vehicle:
One of the first and most important defenses a San Francisco DUI attorney may raise
is the improper stop of your vehicle. The law dictates that law enforcement
officers must have reasonable suspicion to pull you over. If the officer did
not have a valid reason to stop your vehicle, any evidence gathered from the
stop could be deemed inadmissible in court.
Reasonable suspicion can include things like erratic
driving, speeding, or a traffic violation. However, if the officer pulled you
over without cause or based on a hunch, your San Francisco DUI Attorney could
argue that the stop was unlawful. If the court agrees, the DUI charge may be
dismissed, as the evidence collected during the unlawful stop cannot be used
against you.
Faulty Field Sobriety Tests:
Field sobriety tests (FSTs) are commonly used by officers
during a traffic stop to determine whether a driver is impaired. These tests
include tasks like walking in a straight line, balancing on one foot, or
following a moving object with your eyes. However, San Francisco DUI attorneys know that these tests are not
foolproof. Several factors can cause a person to fail an FST even when they are
sober, such as:
- Poor
road conditions
- Physical
disabilities or injuries
- Nervousness
- Weather
conditions
- Improperly
administered tests
If your San
Francisco DUI attorney can prove that the officer did not properly conduct
the FSTs or that external factors affected your performance, they may argue
that the results were unreliable. This defense could weaken the case against
you, potentially leading to a reduced sentence or dismissal of charges.
Accuracy of Breathalyzer Results:
Breathalyzer tests are one of the most commonly used methods
for determining blood alcohol content (BAC). However, San Francisco DUI attorneys are well aware that these tests are
not always accurate. Several factors can cause a breathalyzer to provide a
false reading, including:
- Improper
calibration: Breathalyzers must be regularly calibrated to ensure
their accuracy. If the device wasn’t calibrated correctly before use, it
may produce inaccurate results.
- Improper
use: If the officer did not administer the breathalyzer test
correctly, this could compromise the reliability of the results.
- Mouth
alcohol: If you had recently burped, regurgitated, or had alcohol in
your mouth, it could lead to a falsely high BAC reading.
- Medical
conditions: Certain medical conditions, such as acid reflux, can cause
alcohol to remain in your mouth and affect the reading.
If your San Francisco DUI attorney can show that the
breathalyzer test was improperly administered or that the device was not
functioning correctly, the results may be dismissed as evidence. This could be
a critical defense in lowering or eliminating the charges against you.
Blood Test Challenges:
Blood tests are another method used to determine a driver’s
BAC. While blood tests tend to be more accurate than breathalyzer tests, they
are still subject to challenges in court. Several common issues with blood
tests include:
- Chain
of custody: Blood samples must be handled and stored properly to avoid
contamination. If there is any break in the chain of custody, a San Francisco DUI attorney could
argue that the results cannot be trusted.
- Improper
testing procedures: The laboratory that processes the blood sample
must follow strict protocols to ensure accuracy. If the lab did not follow
these procedures, the test results could be challenged.
Timing of the test: Blood alcohol levels can fluctuate
over time. The
BAC measurements might not fairly represent your level of impairment at the
time of driving if the blood sample was obtained too late after the arrest.
A skilled San
Francisco DUI attorney can scrutinize these factors and challenge the
blood test results if they are flawed. If successful, this defense can
significantly reduce the impact of the DUI charge.
Medical Conditions or Medications:
Certain medical conditions or medications can mimic the
effects of alcohol impairment or even cause false positives on DUI tests.
Conditions like diabetes, acid reflux, and hypoglycemia can cause symptoms such
as slurred speech, poor coordination, and confusion, which may resemble alcohol
intoxication. Additionally, certain prescription medications, especially those
with sedative effects or that impair motor skills, may affect a person’s
ability to pass field sobriety tests or produce misleading breathalyzer or
blood test results.
If you have a medical condition or take medication that
could explain your behavior or test results, a San Francisco DUI attorney may use this as a defense. By
presenting medical evidence, they could show that your apparent impairment was
not due to alcohol or drugs but rather a medical condition. This defense can
help to mitigate or eliminate DUI charges.
Lack of Proof of Intoxication:
In a DUI case, the prosecution must prove that you were
operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. If the
prosecution cannot provide sufficient evidence that you were impaired, your San Francisco DUI attorney may argue
that the evidence is not strong enough to convict you. This defense is
particularly effective if there is little to no physical evidence of
intoxication, such as the absence of erratic driving, failure to pass field
sobriety tests, or a low BAC level.
If the prosecution does not have enough proof that you were
impaired at the time of driving, the case may be dismissed or reduced. A
skilled San Francisco DUI attorney
will closely review the evidence and challenge any gaps in the prosecution's
case.
Rising Blood Alcohol Content:
The "rising BAC" defense can be used if you were
arrested shortly after consuming alcohol. Alcohol takes time to be absorbed
into the bloodstream, and your BAC may have been below the legal limit when you
were driving, but higher at the time of the test. If your San Francisco DUI attorney can show
that your BAC was still rising at the time of the arrest, they can argue that
you were not legally intoxicated when you were driving.
This defense is often effective when combined with evidence
like the timing of your last drink and the time between the arrest and the BAC
test. A San Francisco DUI attorney
will thoroughly review the timeline of events to determine if this defense is
applicable to your case.
Challenging The Officer’s Observations:
The officer’s observations and testimony can be critical in
a DUI case. A San Francisco DUI
attorney may challenge the credibility of the officer’s testimony by
pointing out inconsistencies, biases, or a lack of objectivity. For example,
suppose the officer claims that you were driving erratically but fails to
provide specific details about your driving behavior. In that case, your
attorney may argue that the officer’s observations are subjective and
unreliable.
Additionally, if the officer has a history of making errors
in previous DUI arrests or exhibits bias toward certain individuals, this can
be used to undermine their credibility. By questioning the officer’s
observations, a San Francisco DUI attorney can cast doubt on the
prosecution’s case.
Lack of Probable Cause for Arrest:
Probable cause is required for a DUI arrest. If the officer
did not have sufficient evidence to believe that you were impaired at the time
of the arrest, your San Francisco DUI
attorney may argue that your arrest was unlawful. The officer must have
observed clear signs of impairment, such as erratic driving or failed field
sobriety tests, to justify the arrest.
Suppose your San Francisco DUI attorney can prove that there
was no probable cause to arrest you. In that case, any evidence collected after
the arrest may be inadmissible, and the charges could be dropped.
Conclusion:
Facing a DUI charge in San Francisco can be a daunting experience, but a San Francisco DUI Attorney can use several defenses to challenge the charges and protect your rights. Whether it's questioning the validity of the traffic stop, challenging the results of breathalyzer or blood tests, or demonstrating that you were not impaired at the time of driving, an experienced DUI attorney will work to identify the best defense strategy for your case.
0 Comments